论文部分内容阅读
在联合国的大力推动下,“保护的责任”作为一个重要概念,正进入国际社会成员针对集体行动的讨论之中。然而,这个新理念是否已经成为一项国际法规范则尚存争议。按照传统的国际法理论,“保护的责任”在法律效力、规范认同等各个方面都存在缺陷。但是,依据国际法渊源的理论,“保护的责任”原则可以从人权公约中找到其法律效力来源,特别是《联合国宪章》以及《关于防止及惩治种族灭绝罪公约》等国际法文件;此外,由于“保护的责任”已经通过了联合国大会的审议,并且在重大国际决策中成为各个国家绕不开的议题,因此可以说,“保护的责任”包含在正处于发展中的国际社会的基本价值中。总之,“保护的责任”是一种国际政治话语策略,而不是一个无法律效力的、空洞的政治修辞。
With the vigorous efforts of the United Nations, “the responsibility to protect” is entering the discussion of collective action by members of the international community as an important concept. However, it is debatable whether this new concept has become a norm of international law. According to the traditional theory of international law, the “responsibility to protect” is flawed in all aspects, such as legal validity and standard approval. However, according to the theory of the origin of international law, the principle of “responsibility to protect” can find sources of legal validity from human rights conventions, especially the documents of international law such as the “UN Charter” and the “Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide.” In addition, Since the “responsibility to protect” has been reviewed by the UN General Assembly and has become an issue that every country can not circumvent in major international decisions, it can be said that “the responsibility to protect” is contained in the developing international In the basic social values. In short, “responsibility to protect ” is an international political discourse strategy, not a non-legal, empty political rhetoric.