论文部分内容阅读
《不能带着原罪干安监》与《做一名富有责任感的安监人》在《劳动保护》发表后,在全国安监系统引起反响,两文分别从安监人与企业安技员的不同视角,反映了安监执法履职与应担责任面临的尴尬与见解。同样,这些矛盾在南通市也存在。2013年以来,南通市安监系统因生产安全事故被实施责任追究1人(科级)、党纪政纪处分3人(科级1人、一般人员2人);乡镇(街道)安监机构被问责2人(科级)。此外,
“Can not bring the crime of original safety guards” and “to be a responsible safety supervision officer” in the “labor protection” after the publication of the national safety monitoring system aroused repercussions, the two were from safety supervision officers and corporate security technicians Different perspectives reflect the awkwardness and opinion facing the safety supervision and law enforcement duties and responsibilities. Again, these contradictions also exist in Nantong. Since 2013, Nantong Safety Supervision System has been held responsible for the production safety accident 1 (Section level), party discipline and discipline disciplinary punishment 3 (Section level 1, general staff 2); township (street) safety supervision agency was asked Responsible for 2 (Section level). In addition,