论文部分内容阅读
我局编制站修所标准图时,一些设计单位提出要求将有关站修所检修工作量计算编入标准内。该标准中,将站修所划分为30、24、16、8台位四种规模。但是,该标准并没有解决今后应如何套用问题。由于采用的计算方法、计算指标的不同,往往用同样的行车资料,得到不同的计算结果,选用的规模相差甚大,造成一些不必要的矛盾。由于对一些重要指示(如货车日车公里、摘车临修率、摘车轴检比例等),目前还缺乏统计资料和依据,因此本文谈及的一些指标仅供参考。
When compiling the standard map of the station repair station, some design institutes requested that the maintenance workload calculation of the station repair be incorporated into the standard. The standard, the station repair will be divided into 30,24,16,8 units of four sizes. However, the standard does not address how to apply the problem in the future. As a result of the calculation method used to calculate the different indicators, often with the same driving information, get different calculations, the choice of a large difference between the size, resulting in some unnecessary conflicts. Due to the lack of statistical data and basis for some important instructions (such as the daily delivery of trucks, pick-up, pick-up, etc.), some of the indicators mentioned in this article are for reference only.