本文在查尔默斯“语词之争”的背景下讨论哲学进步问题,考察几种不同的哲学进步观点,我想指出查尔默斯对基底概念的承诺假设了概念的多元主义,概念多元主义才是查尔默斯语词之争的核心,但概念多元主义没有对各种概念的解释效力加以说明,因此若要讨论哲学进步,我们需要对概念的解释效力给出一个原则性的说明。 This paper discusses the issue of philosophical progress in the context of Chalmers “Verbal Dispute ” and examines several different philosophical advances, and I would like to point out that Chalmers’ commitment to the notion of base assumes the concept of pluralism, Pluralism is at the core of the Chalmers discourse, but conceptual pluralism does not explain the explanatory power of concepts, so to discuss philosophical progress we need to give a principled account of the explanatory power of concepts .