论文部分内容阅读
经常有教师与我谈及关于“问题解决(或解决问题)”的教学问题:解决问题到底该怎么教?教什么?教到什么程度?觉得以前的应用题多好啊,为什么现在没了?但由于底气不足我均予以回避。我一直是《中小学数学》(小学版)的忠实读者。在这本刊物上,有幸拜读了2011年第四期张春梅撰写的《浅谈小学数学教学中如何建构数学模型》及随后的《编者语》,2011年第7—8期“尝试教学理论”创立者邱学华先生的《为“应用题”正名》及《编者语:数学教育安全吗?》。而且还在网上拜读了贵刊编者语《闲扯“应用题”》。感悟深刻,反思不断,觉得正如邱学华先生讲:该给应用题正名了。应用题必须复出。
Often there are teachers talking to me about “Problem Solving (or Solving Problems)” teaching problem: how to solve problems in the end? What to teach? To what extent? I think the previous application questions how good, why not now However, due to lack of confidence I have to be avoided. I have always been a loyal reader of Primary and Secondary Mathematics (Elementary Edition). In this publication, I was fortunate to read “How to Construct Mathematical Models in Primary Mathematics Teaching” and “Editor’s Notes” Written by Zhang Chunmei, No. 4, 2011, No. 7-8, 2011, “Try Teaching Theory The founder of Mr. Qiu Xuehua ”for“ application title ”name “ and ”editorial language: mathematics education safe?“ But also on the Internet to read your editor’s language ”freehand“ application title ”. Profound insight, continuous reflection, as Mr. Qiu Xuehua said: the application should be rectified. Application questions must come back.