论文部分内容阅读
法条竞合特别关系以逻辑上的属种(而非整体部分)关系为基础,因此,特别法条并不是在普通法条构成要件基础上添加了特别要素,而只是对其已有若干构成要件要素做了更具体的限定,从而使得特别法条与普通法条所表征的违法或(与)责任存在程度上的不同。特别关系法条竞合之所以原则上必须坚持特别法优先的适用规则,并非因为特别法条具有立法上的特别用意,而是由于通常只有适用特别法条才能实现对行为犯罪性的完整评价(罪刑均衡)。但是,在“特别法条畸轻”的场合,只要刑法没有明确的禁止性规定,为了实现实质意义上的完整评价,应当准许适用普通法条。这既不违背罪刑法定原则,也不会颠倒“先定罪后量刑”的司法裁判顺序和损害构成要件之行为定型。
The special law of competition is based on a logical genus (rather than an integral part) relationship. Therefore, the special law does not add special elements to common law elements, The elements of the requirement have been more specifically defined so that the special laws and ordinances vary in the degree of breach of law or (and) liability. In particular, the reason why a particular relationship competes with a law must adhere to the applicable rules that give priority to the lex specialis not because the special laws have a special legislative intent, but rather that a complete evaluation of the criminal nature of the act can usually be achieved only by applying special laws ( Crime and punishment balance). However, in the case of “special laws and regulations ”, as long as there is no explicit prohibition of criminal law provisions, in order to achieve a complete evaluation of the substantive, should be permitted to apply common law. This neither violates the principle of legality of crimes, nor does it upside down the order of judicial decisions and the behavior that undermines elements that constitute “elements of sentencing after conviction”.