论文部分内容阅读
本文试图从两方面论述国家主权理论及实践的发展对国际商事仲裁的辩证影响。一方面,经济全球化趋势的冲击正在日益虚拟和模糊着传统意义上的国家边界,它使得一国主权管辖的领域正面临挑战,也使得世界各国的相互依存日益加深,主权国家不得不相应调整职能以实现其根本利益或长远利益。作为这种调整的重要手段之一,国际商事仲裁被赋予较从前更为宽松的法律环境与施展空间。另一方面,无论国家主权受到如何冲击,就目前阶段而言,国家主权原则仍是不可超越,也正是这种地位如初的国家主权原则成为国际商事仲裁的最后保障,使仲裁当事人在享有极大的自由度的同时也拥有司法底线的安全。
This article attempts to discuss the dialectical impact of the development of state sovereignty theory and practice on international commercial arbitration from two aspects. On the one hand, the impact of the trend of economic globalization is increasingly fictitiously and vaguely confusing the borders of countries in the traditional sense. It makes the areas under the sovereignty of one country facing challenges and deepens the interdependence of all countries in the world and the sovereign countries have to adjust accordingly Function to achieve its fundamental interests or long-term interests. As one of the important means of such adjustment, international commercial arbitration has been given a more relaxed legal environment and room for development than before. On the other hand, no matter how the national sovereignty is impacted, the principle of state sovereignty remains invincible at this stage, and it is this principle of sovereign sovereignty that has assumed its original status as the ultimate guarantee of international commercial arbitration. As a result, Large degree of freedom also has the judicial bottom line safety.