论文部分内容阅读
关于今年全国高考作文题的争论几近偃旗息鼓。双方唇枪舌剑,势均力敌,似乎真要辩出个是非曲直来。且不说真理握在哪一方,仅大家的参与意识和高昂热情就着实令人钦佩。这一争论提示我们,如何以观念的更新和方法的改革切实提高学生的写作能力,仍需下大力气深入研究。为此,我们将收到的部分有关稿件进行摘录,摆出正反双方辩论的阵容,可使读者朋友了解这一争论的概貌,并希望能对作文教学的深入改革和以后的复习备考提供一些启示或帮助。
The debate on the national college entrance exam essay this year is almost nothing. As the two sides are very close to each other, it seems that they really have to judge the right and wrong. Not to mention where the truth is held, only everyone’s sense of participation and high enthusiasm are truly admirable. This controversy reminds us that how to effectively improve the writing ability of students with the renewal of ideas and method reforms still requires a great deal of in-depth research. To this end, we will extract some of the relevant manuscripts received, put forward the lineup between the pros and cons of the debate, enable readers and friends to understand the outline of this controversy, and hope to provide some in-depth reform of composition teaching and later review preparation to provide some Revelation or help.