论文部分内容阅读
有关特异功能的争论。一直纠缠在“是否科学”这一论断上。那么,到底科学是为了什么?什么才是科学?正反双方都把自己的检验标准,观测方法,理论陈述视为真正的科学。而本文作者认为,在所谓的标准、方法、手段上去进行喋喋不休的争论。早已偏离了事物的本质,因为科学不是检验一切正确与否,存在与否的标准。气功与特异功能应是独立于“科学”以外的另一门学问,它应该摆脱“是否科学”的无谓争议,寻求自身的发展。这一论点,是这场争论中出现的一种刺目而显眼的灰色“怪论”,不知正反双方会对此作出何种反应?
Arguments about specific functions. Has been entangled in the “whether science” on the thesis. So, in the end what is science and what is science? Both positive and negative their own testing standards, methods of observation, theoretical statements as a real science. The author of this article thinks that the so-called standards, methods and means go on endless chatter. It has already deviated from the essence of things because science is not a test of everything correct or not, its existence or not. Qigong and specific functions should be independent of “science” other than learning, it should get rid of the “scientific” unnecessary controversy and seek their own development. This argument is a glaring and conspicuous gray “blame theory” that appears in this debate. I do not know what kind of reaction the two sides will make to this.