论文部分内容阅读
一股创新之风正弥散开来,从中国到亚洲,再到整个世界。2006年达沃斯世界经济年会的主题是“急需创新”, 2006年北京“两会”的关键词也有创新。 2006年3月12日,一场主题为自主创新的论坛在北京长安俱乐部举行。这是《中国企业家》杂志从1999年来的第七次“两会”沙龙,尽管每年的主题不一样,但每年的主题无疑是当年中国商界、中国商人最关注的重大话题。2006年的春天是从自主创新开始迎来第一缕春光的。有人关注创新的社会环境,有人关注保障创新的法律,有人关注企业创新的国家政策和制度安排,也有人关注企业创新的操作实务……一个结论是,基于有中国特色的国情,企业界的自主创新是需要勇气和耐心的。牛文文(主持人) 企业如何面对创新国策今年是改革开放三十年,同时也是“十一五”规划的第一年,也是历史上第一次把自主创新当成一种国策。韩国和日本都是国家在没有向外开放的情况下支持本土企业创新的,我们现在在市场彻底开放,知识产权高度保护的情况下,再讲自主创新,可能会感
An innovative wind is spreading away from China to Asia and to the entire world. The theme of the 2006 annual meeting of the world economy in Davos was “the urgent need of innovation”. The key words of the “two sessions” of Beijing in 2006 are also innovative. March 12, 2006, a theme for independent innovation forum held in Beijing Chang’an Club. This is the seventh Salon held by the “China Entrepreneurs” magazine from 1999 to 1999. Although the topics are different every year, the theme of each year is undoubtedly the most important topic of concern to Chinese business people and Chinese businessmen that year. In the spring of 2006, the first ray of spring light began to emerge from independent innovation. Some people concerned about the innovative social environment, some people concerned about the protection of innovation law, some people concerned about the innovation of national policy and institutional arrangements, and some people pay attention to the practice of business innovation ... One conclusion is that based on the characteristics of Chinese characteristics, business autonomy Innovation requires courage and patience. Niu Wenwen (Moderator) How Enterprises Face Innovation Policy This year is the first 30 years of reform and opening up and also the first year of the 11th Five-Year Plan. It is also the first time in history that independent innovation is regarded as a national policy. Both South Korea and Japan are countries that support the innovation of local enterprises without opening up to the outside world. Now that we are fully liberalized and highly protected by intellectual property, we are still talking about innovation and may feel