论文部分内容阅读
在社会各界对我国法院司法裁判文书“不讲理”的不满和指责中,2001年广州海事法院的一项审判制度改革,不仅大大改观了中国法院裁判文书公式化,缺少甚至没有判决理由和法律论证的现状,而且该项改革举措还撩起了长期以来披裹在法官身上的“合议庭”及“本院认为”的朦胧面纱,把法官作出法律判断过程中对当下案件所涉及的法律和事实问题的不同认识昭然与众。对法官思维过程的公开,不仅从制度上打破了审判过程中的最后一个暗箱,形成了对法官腐败的根本遏制;而且它还消解着法律学术界与实务界日渐扩大的隔陌与疏离,提炼和积累了法律的经验知识,融通着我们关于法律的思考。可以说,在某种意义上,法官是行动着的法律。我们希望这些特色判决的刊载,对读者通过追寻法官思维的过程,打捞与积淀法律适用与法律发现的方法与思维有所脾益。
In the dissatisfaction and accusation of various circles of our society over the court judiciary instruments of our country, “unreasonableness”, a judicial system reform in the Guangzhou Maritime Court in 2001 not only greatly changed the formulation of the Chinese court judgment instruments, but also lacks no judgment or law And the reform measures have also lifted the obscure veil that the “collegiate panel” and “the court held that” the party has long wrapped in the judge, and made the judge’s judgment concerning the current cases involved in the legal judgment The legal and factual issues of different understanding with the public. The openness of the judge’s thinking process not only broke the last black box in the process of trial from the system, but also fundamentally deterred the judge’s corruption; moreover, it also dispelled the growing dissociation and alienation of the legal academia and the practice community And the accumulation of legal experience in the knowledge, blending our thinking about the law. It can be said that in a sense, a judge is a law of action. We hope that the publication of these distinctive judgments will benefit the readers through the process of seeking judges’ thinking, salvage and accumulating the methods and thinking of law application and law discovery.