论文部分内容阅读
君主专制体制下的古代中国,无论从理念还是在制度设计中,皆否认了法官在司法实践过程中拥有主观能动色彩的法律解释权。“君权独制”的理念,成为法律解释权只应是君主所独享的权力的理论渊源。而在具体的制度设计中,通过琐细而具体的立法模式及严苛的法律责任规定,试图完全挤压掉法官法律解释的空间,但与法官在具体的司法实践中所具有的过于膨胀的法律解释权形成了一种强烈的对比。
Ancient China under monarchy and autocratic monarchy denied the judges the right to interpret their subjective and active colors in judicial practice both in philosophy and in system design. “Sovereign autonomy ” concept, the power of legal interpretation should only be the theoretical origin of the sovereign power. In the specific system design, through trivial and specific legislative model and strict legal liability regulations, trying to completely squeeze out the judge legal interpretation of the space, but with the judge in the specific judicial practice with the over-expansion of the law The power of interpretation forms a strong contrast.