论文部分内容阅读
近来,有关媒体对平顶山食品城集团的“思想大扫除运动”的一些做法进行了报道,在社会上引起了强烈的反响,有人不满、愤怒,认为其评选“五大员”、群众批评领导、人人过关等做法是拾起“文革”的旧招数,是“文革运动”的回潮。也有一些人,尤其是较为了解这个运动的人则相反,认为这完全是企业自己的文化创建活动,其他任何单位和个人都无权干预。同一事件,评价如此鲜明对立,水火不容,这究竟是为什么?8月中旬,记者前往调查……
Recently, the media have reported on some practices of the “ideological clean-up campaign” of the Pingdingshan Food City Group, which has caused a strong response in the community. Some people are dissatisfied and angry and believe that they selected the “five members”, the masses criticized the leadership, and everyone. Clearing up the old tactics of the “Cultural Revolution,” such as customs clearance, is a resurgence of the “Cultural Revolution Movement.” Some people, especially those who know more about this movement, on the contrary, think that this is entirely an enterprise’s own cultural creation activity. No other unit or individual has the right to intervene. In the same incident, the assessment was so stark and opposed to each other that they were not able to tolerate the situation. What is this exactly? In mid-August, the reporter went to investigate...