论文部分内容阅读
公平责任原则能否适用于高等学校学生伤害事故,一直是高等学校学生伤害事故归责原则研究和适用中争议的焦点之一。争议在理论研究、司法实践和地方立法中的对立,实际是民法学界公平责任原则存废争议的延伸,源自对《民法通则》实施以来我国立法、司法解释,特别是《侵权法》相关规定的不同解读。对此所作的分层分析表明,我国法律既没有肯定公平责任原则的法律定位,也不存在公平责任原则适用于高等学校学生伤害事故的规定。“公平责任原则”只能作为归结法律责任以外社会责任的一项损害分担规则。
Whether the principle of fair liability can be applied to student injury accidents in colleges and universities has always been one of the focuses of controversy in the study and application of the principle of liability for injuries caused by students in colleges and universities. The controversy between theoretical research, judicial practice and local legislation is actually an extension of the dispute over the principle of fair liability in civil law jurisprudence. It comes from the interpretation of our country’s legislation, judicial interpretation and especially the relevant provisions of Tort Law since the implementation of the General Principles of Civil Law Different interpretations. The stratified analysis on this point shows that our country’s law has neither the legal position of affirming the principle of fair responsibility, nor the principle that the principle of fair liability is applicable to the accidental injury of students in colleges and universities. “The principle of fair responsibility ” can only be used as a way to share the damages of social responsibility beyond the legal liability.