论文部分内容阅读
审稿专家是科技期刊最为重要的办刊资源之一,审稿质量是决定科技期刊学术水平的一个重要因素。自《浙江农业学报》网站开通以来,编辑部在原有的基础上进一步搜集、扩充专家资料,建立审稿专家库。本文整理分析了近2年的稿件审阅情况,讨论如何根据专家职称等级、年龄、审稿质量、审稿时间等选择适宜的审稿专家。在此基础上提出应积极扩充审稿专家队伍,汲取众家之长提高稿件质量;要大胆选用青年审稿专家,储备一批优秀的后备专家力量;同时要与审稿专家保持良好的合作关系,充分尊重审稿专家的意见,力求在互益互促的前提下提高刊物的学术水平和出版质量。
Reviewers are one of the most important resources for sci-tech periodicals. Reviewership quality is an important factor that determines the academic level of sci-tech periodicals. Since the opening of the website of Zhejiang Journal of Agriculture, the editorial department has further collected and expanded experts’ information on the basis of the original, and established a repertory expert database. This article analyzes and analyzes the situation of manuscript review in the past two years and discusses how to select suitable reviewers according to the level of professional titles, age, manuscript quality, manuscript review time and so on. On this basis, it is suggested that the team of reviewers should be actively expanded and the quality of manuscripts should be drawn up to improve the manuscript quality. Young reviewers should be bravely selected to reserve a group of outstanding reserve experts, while maintaining good cooperation with reviewers , Fully respect the opinions of reviewers and strive to improve the academic quality and publication quality of publications on the premise of mutual benefit and mutual promotion.