论文部分内容阅读
甘肃法院审理的苏州工业园区海富投资有限公司(以下简称海富公司)和甘肃世恒有色资源再利用有限公司(以下简称世恒公司)的投资纠纷案件引起了理论界和实务界的广泛关注,①司法是否支持海富公司的补偿请求,其核心在于对案件中涉及的“估值调整条款”的法律效力如何认定。海富案件引发的巨大争议将司法裁判推向舆论的焦点,而股权投资估值调整协定的法律性质及效力判断等在司法实践中仍是崭新的课题,估值调整行为
Investment dispute cases involving Suzhou Industrial Park Haifu Investment Co., Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as Haifu Company) and Gansu Shiheng Nonferrous Resources Recycling Co., Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as Shiheng Company) trial by Gansu Court aroused widespread concern of theorists and practitioners ① Whether the judiciary supports Haifu’s compensation claims lies at the core of how to determine the legal validity of the “valuation adjustment clauses” involved in the case. The tremendous controversy triggered by the case of Haifu pushed the judicial adjudication to the focus of public opinion. However, the legal nature and validity judgment of the equity investment valuation adjustment agreement are still brand new issues in judicial practice. The valuation adjustment behavior