论文部分内容阅读
在社会分化背景下,富人治村的出现具有普遍性与必然性。本文通过对不同类型富人治村状况的分析,探讨了社会分化背景下基层民主制度的实践机制。研究表明,富人治村在实践中呈现出多种样态,根据国家权力在基层配置方式的不同,可以将其划分为资本主导、行政主导、公共规则主导三种类型,三者反映了基层民主制度的不同实践。国家是影响基层民主实践的重要力量,它的良性运行依赖于国家权力的合理配置。对国家的强调,有助于厘清学界对于富人治村的诸多争论,为社会分化背景下探索基层民主的发展路径提供借鉴。随着农村社会不断走向分化与多元化,国家既要通过行政放权给予社会更多自治空间,又要规范和协调各种利益与权力关系,为乡村治理提供良好的制度供给,推进基层民主得到实质性发展。
Under the background of social differentiation, the appearance of the rich governance village is universal and inevitable. Based on the analysis of the status quo of different types of rich manners in villages, this paper explores the practical mechanism of grassroots democracy in the context of social differentiation. The research shows that the rich people’s governance village presents a variety of patterns in practice. According to the differences in the allocation of grassroots power by state power, it can be divided into three types: capital-led, executive-led, and public-dominated. The three reflect the grassroots democracy Different practices of the system. The state is an important force that affects the practice of grassroots democracy. Its benign operation depends on the rational allocation of state power. Emphasis on the state helps to clarify many controversies over the rich governance village in the academic field and provides references for exploring the development path of grassroots democracy in the context of social differentiation. With the continuous differentiation and diversification of rural society, the state should give more social autonomy space through administrative decentralization, regulate and coordinate various interests and power relations, provide a good system of supply for rural governance, and promote the essence of grassroots democracy Sexual development.