在处理轻微危害行为时,中国采用立法模式,通过量的要求将“情节显著轻微危害不大”的行为排除在犯罪之外,此即立法定性又定量模式;日本采用立法定性、司法定量模式,将量的判断委之于司法处理。不同的处理模式,与两国自身法文化传统、犯罪概念、犯罪构成理论、法律体系等密切相关。两者各有利弊,在分清优劣基础上,完善中国轻微危害行为处理模式。 In dealing with minor acts of harm, China adopted the legislative model and ruled out quantitative and quantitative models by excluding the crime of “significant minor harm” from the requirement of quantity through quantitative requirements. Japan adopts the law of statutory and quantitative judiciary Mode, the amount of judgments entrusted to the judiciary. Different modes of handling are closely related to the legal traditions of the two countries, the concept of crime, the theory of constitution of crime, and the legal system. Both have their own advantages and disadvantages, and on the basis of distinguishing the pros and cons, they will perfect the handling mode of minor harm to China.