论文部分内容阅读
对于民事诉讼中原告撤回起诉以后又以同一诉讼请求和理由对同一当事人再次起诉,人民法院能否再行受理,我国民事诉讼法对此未直接予以明文规定。迄今为止,审判实践中解决这一问题的法律依据是最高人民法院下达的两个属司法解释之列的文件:一为1985年12月14日法(经)复第58号批复《以下简称(85批复)》;一为1990年3月10日法(民)复第3号批复《以下简称(90批复)》。前者规定对原告申请撤诉获准后的再行起诉,人民法院应不予受理;后者又允许原告撤诉后再行起诉,并言明人民法院应予以受理。二个具有同等法律效力的批复却
As for the civil litigation, the plaintiff withdrew the prosecution and later re-sued the same party with the same litigation request and reason, and whether the people’s court could accept the case again. China’s Civil Procedure Law did not explicitly stipulate this directly. So far, the legal basis for settling this issue in trial practice is the two documents listed in the Supreme Court’s judicial interpretations: the “Reply No. 58 of the Law (No. 14) of December 14, 1985” (hereinafter referred to as the “ 85 Approved) ”; a reply of“ Law (Min) Complex No. 3 of March 10, 1990, ”the following abbreviation (90 replies)". The former stipulates that the plaintiff should apply for withdrawal again after the prosecution, the people’s court shall not be accepted; the latter allows the plaintiff to withdraw after the prosecution, and stated that the people’s court should be admissible. Two have the same legal effect of the approval of it