论文部分内容阅读
宪法诉讼(违宪审查)制度,根据审查机关的不同,一般分为法院违宪审查制度和政治机关违宪审查制度两种。根据法院的种类及审查程序的不同,前者又分为普通司法法院型(美国型)违宪审查制度和宪法法院型(西德型)违宪审查制度。普通司法法院型违宪审查制度。是指以传统的司法权观念来理解宪法问题,在具体的法律上的争讼中,一方当事人作为请求根据引用有违宪嫌疑的法律,另一方当事人以其违宪性为理由主张该法律不能适用于该
Constitutional litigation (unconstitutional review) system, according to the different reviewing agencies, are generally divided into the court review of constitutional violations and constitutional review of the two systems. According to the different types of courts and the different review procedures, the former is divided into the common judicial court type (U.S. type) unconstitutional examination system and the constitutional court type (West German type) unconstitutional censorship system. Common Judicial Court Type Unconstitutional Review System. Refers to the concept of the traditional judiciary to understand the issue of constitutional issues in a specific legal litigation, one party as a request based on the law of unconstitutional suspicion, the other party to its unconstitutional grounds that the law can not be applied to This