整理积存的零散文件,一般必须区分年代,但并不是毫无区别的一律要区分年代。比如: 一、当一个机关存在的时间不长,文件不多而其各个年代的文件又有密切联系的时候,可以不区分年代(如广东省土地改革委员会)。在这种情况下,如果一定要区分年代的话,不仅会造成立卷上的很多不便,浪费人力,而且会破坏文件的联系。二、当一个运动跨了二年,而其文件主要是某一年形成的时候,亦可以不必区分年代。此如:“三反”运动是在1951年12月开始到1952年7月基本结束的,1951年仅有很少一部分文件,难以正确的立 Finishing the accumulation of fragmentary documents, the general distinction between the era, but not without distinction must distinguish between the era. For example: First, when an organ does not exist for a long period of time, there are not many documents and there is a close connection between the documents in all the years, the years can not be distinguished (eg, Guangdong Provincial Agrarian Reform Commission). Under such circumstances, if we must make a distinction between the ages, not only will it cause many inconveniences and waste of manpower on the scroll, but also damage the links of the documents. Second, when a movement spanned two years and its document was mainly formed in a certain year, it was not necessary to distinguish the years. For example, the “three oppositions” movement basically ended in December 1951 and ended in July 1952, and in 1951 there were only a few documents that were difficult to correct