论文部分内容阅读
目的分析不同检验方法在丙型肝炎患者中的检验效果。方法 100例丙型肝炎患者,随机分为胶体金法组和酶联免疫法组,各50例。最后借助化学发光诊断法来确诊,对两组患者的检测结果、检测时间和检测成本进行对比。结果胶体金法组中有44例阳性患者,诊断率为88.0%,而酶联免疫法组中有36例阳性患者,诊断率为72.0%,同时胶体金法组患者的检测时间(5.5±1.2)和检测成本(4.5±0.5)均低于酶联免疫法组(9.5±7.5)、(7.8±0.6),两组比较差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论胶体金法在丙型肝炎患者的诊断中具有较高的诊断率,而且检测时间和检测成本比较低,为患者的后期治疗及康复提供了保证,值得临床推广应用。
Objective To analyze the test results of different test methods in hepatitis C patients. Methods One hundred patients with hepatitis C were randomly divided into colloidal gold group and enzyme-linked immunosorbent group, 50 cases each. Finally, with the help of chemiluminescence diagnosis, the test results, test time and test cost of two groups of patients were compared. Results There were 44 positive cases in the colloidal gold group, with a diagnostic rate of 88.0%. In the enzyme immunoassay group, 36 cases were positive, with a diagnostic rate of 72.0%. In the colloidal gold group, the detection time was 5.5 ± 1.2 ) And detection cost (4.5 ± 0.5) were lower than those of enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (9.5 ± 7.5) and (7.8 ± 0.6) respectively. There was significant difference between the two groups (P <0.05). Conclusion The colloidal gold method has a high diagnostic rate in the diagnosis of hepatitis C patients, and the detection time and testing costs are relatively low, which guarantees the patients’ post-treatment and rehabilitation. It is worthy of clinical promotion and application.