论文部分内容阅读
近些年来书学界对于康有为的研究已取得了很大成就,然而成绩的背后还潜藏着问题,其中最突出的问题是视野狭窄,画地为牢。以《广艺舟双楫》与《孔子改制考》的对比为例,康有为的思想内核——激变思想一直贯穿其中,成为其共有的哲学基础,而书学界往往只专注于前者,致力于中国近代史的学者则仅仅用心于后者,以至于科学地定位康有为的整体思想成为空谈。此外,就研究方法而言,明显较为单调;就研究内容而论,则是过于拘泥于碑帖之争。总体看来,有关康有为书学思想的研究还存在着诸多问题。
In recent years, the academic circle has made great achievements in Kang Youwei’s research. However, there are still hidden problems behind the achievements. The most prominent problems are the narrow vision and the dilemma. Taking the comparison of “Guang Yi Zhou Shuang” and “Confucius Restructuring” as an example, Kang Youwei’s thought-core ideology has always run through it and become its common philosophical foundation. However, the book academics often focus on the former and concentrate on China Modern history scholars are only concerned about the latter, so that the scientific concept of Kang Youwei’s overall thinking to become empty talk. In addition, as far as the research methods are concerned, it is obviously monotonous. In terms of the research content, it is too rigidly concerned with the rubbings of rubbings. Generally speaking, there are still many problems about the study of Kang Youwei’s book study.