论文部分内容阅读
海德格尔把唯物史观划为“形而上学的颠倒”的主要依据是 ,马克思终究未能揭示存在者的存在机制。本文认为 ,马克思揭示异化正是从人的存在方式入手的 ,这也就是海德格尔所说的深入到历史的本质性一维中去了。通过对感性存在论的阐释 ,马克思在西方思想史上 ,第一次把私有财产状况下存在者的存在方式呈现出来。现成性的“什么”于是转变为历史性的“怎么”。这是对不思存在机制的形而上学的彻底“解构” ,而不是换汤不换药的所谓“颠倒”。因此 ,“形而上学的颠倒论”只能说是海德格尔对马克思的一种误读。这种误读是把马克思的“对象性存在”混同于形而上学的“对象性思维”了。
Heidegger’s theory of historical materialism as “reversal of metaphysics” is based on Marx’s failure to reveal the existence mechanism of the existence. This article argues that Marx reveals that it is from the way of human being that this is the way in which human beings exist. This is what Heidegger said goes deeper into the essential one-dimensional history. Through the interpretation of sentimentalism, Marx presents for the first time in the history of Western thought the existence of the existence of the private property. The ready-made “what” then turned into a historic “how”. This is a complete “deconstruction” of the metaphysics of a mechanism for the existence of misunderstandings, not a so-called “reversal” of a change of arms. Therefore, “the reversal of metaphysics” can only be described as a misunderstanding of Marx by Heidegger. This misreading is to confuse Marx’s “object existence” with metaphysics “object thinking”.