论文部分内容阅读
2007年欧盟《非合同之债法律适用条例》(罗马Ⅱ)是侵权冲突法立法的典范。罗马Ⅱ洋溢着平衡与理性的精神,但关键处亦偏袒欧盟国家的利益需要。中国侵权冲突法已经严重滞后于时代。对比罗马Ⅱ与中国侵权冲突法的一般规则,指陈各自的利弊得失,揭示各自所需服务的特殊法律政策,探索侵权行为地法、共同住所地法、最密切联系原则和意思自治这四大系属公式在侵权冲突法的一般规则中的最佳结合方式,有助于我国在当下的国际私法立法中构建科学合理的侵权冲突法的一般规则。
The 2007 EU Law on the Application of Laws on Non-Contracts (Rome II) is a model of the law of Torts Act. Rome Ⅱ is imbued with the spirit of balance and rationality, but the key points also favor the interests of EU countries. China’s Tort Law has lagged far behind the times. Contrasting the general rules of Rome II and China’s Torts Law, we refer to the pros and cons of each of them, revealing the special legal policies of their respective services, exploring the law of infringement, the law of common residence, the principle of the closest connection and the autonomy of autonomy It is helpful for our country to construct the general rules of scientific and reasonable tort law in the current legislation of private international law.