学术争鸣是任何一个学术刊物乐于组织和参与的。本期特别开辟“文学审美意识形态争鸣”栏目所发表的这一组文章,包括对近年来国内一些学者发表的对文学审美意识形态论所作质疑和批评的回应。许多批评审美意识形态论的作者,集中对审美意识形态的提出者钱中文等的观点进行驳难。这次本刊特地约请相关学者写稿,就批评者提出的一些主要问题进行反批评。本刊主编钱中文的《文学意识形态与不是意识形态论引起的论争——兼论文学审美意识形态的逻辑起点及其历史生成》是一篇长文,其中一些部分在《文学评论》等刊物上已经先期发表。这一次编辑部征得作者同意,决定 Academic debate is that any academic journals are willing to organize and participate. In this issue, we specially open this series of articles published in the column entitled “Literary Aesthetic Ideological Contending,” including responses to questions and criticisms made by some domestic scholars over the literary aesthetic ideology in recent years. Many writers who criticize the theory of aesthetic ideology have refuted the viewpoint of Qian Zhongwen, the author of aesthetic ideology. This article specially invited relevant scholars to write manuscripts to criticize some of the major issues raised by critics. The article editor Qian Zhongwen’s “Literary Ideology and Not Ideological Dispute Caused - On the literary aesthetic ideology of the logical starting point and its historical production” is a long article, some of them in the “Literary Review” and other publications On the pre-published. This time the editorial department with the author’s consent, the decision