千百年来,诸葛亮作为三国时期的蜀国贤相,被后世认为是一位足智多谋的智慧的化身,尤其是他那“鞠躬尽瘁、死而后已”的献身精神,已经跨越了时代的藩篱,被广泛地认同和衷心地称道。但近年来,随着人们思想认识的开阔,对历史诸多事件与人物评价的反思,包括诸葛亮的某些方面也有与传统不同的指评,这当然是正常的,甚至也是有益的。其中有一种带负面情质的说法好像早就有过,这就是说诸葛亮发现、培养人才不够,更不能放手使用人才,往 For thousands of years, Zhuge Liang, as a virtuous man of Shu in the Three Kingdoms period, was later described as a resourceful and resourceful personage, especially since his devotion to “doing his utmost to death and then” has crossed the hedges of the times , Is widely recognized and heartily praised. However, in recent years, as people’s ideological understanding has broadened, it is of course normal and even beneficial to reflect on many historical events and personal evaluations, including some aspects of Zhuge Liang, which differ from the traditional ones. There is a negative argument that seems to have existed for a long time. That is to say, Zhuge Liang found that there is not enough talent to train people,