论文部分内容阅读
从“沉默权”的制度作用可以追踪到现代国家之中公权力所必须承担的宪法意义上的举证责任。以宪法内容的权力—权利两分法角度观察,该种举证责任在既定的宪法秩序之中产生,分为权力分配与设立中的“肯定式举证”和公民权利限制中的“否定式举证”。在当代国家,这两种举证责任的承担方式主要是通过立法(广义法律)进行,其结论的合法性主要来自于既定的立法程序。进而,公权力在宪法上的举证责任,于宪政秩序的建设中也就承担着合法性之证明的作用。
From the institutional function of “right of silence”, we can trace the burden of proof in the constitutional sense that must be assumed by the public power in modern countries. From the perspective of dichotomy of powers of the constitution - right, the burden of proof arises in the established constitutional order, which is divided into “positive proof” in the distribution and establishment of power and “negative” in the restriction of civil rights Style proof ". In contemporary countries, the two forms of burden of proof are mainly through legislation (generalized law), the conclusion of which is mainly due to the legitimacy of the established legislative process. Furthermore, the burden of proof on the constitutional power of public power also assumes the proof of legitimacy in the constitutional order construction.