论文部分内容阅读
在今天对康德理论理性批判的解读中,“经验的类比”受到了愈来愈多的关注。但是要理解康德的“经验的类比”需要两个前提:一个是对康德书写的时代上下文的了解,另一个是对康德的先验演绎本质的理解,而这一切又都集中在“构成性的(konstitutiv)”这样一个概念上。法兰西学院的威约曼教授紧扣康德书写的时代上下文和先验演绎的逻辑,对此概念以及与此概念相关的概念做了深刻的阐述,从而澄清了一些诠释者对于这一概念以至康德的理论理性批判所造成的迷雾。
In today’s interpretation of the rational critique of Kant’s theory, “analogy of experience” receives more and more attention. But understanding Kant’s “analogy of experience” requires two premises: one is an understanding of the context of the time written by Kant and the other is an understanding of Kant’s transcendental deductive essence, all of which is focused on “constitutive (konstitutiv) ”such a concept. Prof. Wei Jomman from the Institut de France paid close attention to the temporal context and the logic of transcendental deduction written by Kant and elaborates on this concept and concepts related to this concept so as to clarify some interpretations of this concept and even Kant’s The fog caused by theoretical rational criticism.