论文部分内容阅读
2013年12月,我在山东枣庄参加第四届春节文化论坛,有个题目在那个会上未能展开讨论,我想在此就上次讨论的问题再做一些说明。现有的节日志正处在学术转型的过程中,和以往节日志相比,一个重大的区别是《中国节日志》比较强调现场的调查,每个节日志里有相当大的篇幅,是有各学科点的教师带领学生在一定节日题目的要求下,对城乡具体地点进行详实的节日文化调查,这是中国节日志的创举。现在的节日志是过程中的节日志,不是最权威的、最可靠的、最符合历史的
In December 2013, I participated in the fourth Spring Festival Culture Forum in Zaozhuang, Shandong Province. There was a topic that I was unable to discuss at that meeting. I would like to explain some of the issues discussed last time here. The existing festival diary is in the process of academic transformation. Compared with previous festival diaries, one major difference is that “Chinese festival diary” places more emphasis on field investigation. There is a considerable space in each festival diary, Teachers from all disciplines lead students to conduct detailed festival and culture surveys on specific locations in urban and rural areas under the requirements of certain festival topics. The festival diary now is the festival diary, not the most authoritative, the most reliable, the most historical