论文部分内容阅读
古时候有位私塾先生,把“岂(豈)有此理”,读成“豆有此理”.一个学生提出了疑问:“豆?咋有山字头?”先生马上愤愤然:“你懂什么!没山的豆是平地上种的豆,这个有山的‘豆'是山里长的嘛,真是豆有此理!”这位先生,以我为对,只搞“一言堂”,既缺乏实事求是的精神,又缺乏教学民主. 当前,我们也有一些同事在某种程度上,还存有那位私塾先生的遗风.前几天,听了一节语文课.课上,一个学生指出了老师读音的错误,老师有点不悦.后来又有一个学生站起来,对老师所讲问题提出了异议,这位老师马上板起了面孔:“是听你的还是听我的?!”如果说那位古代先生的做法浅薄得可笑,那么我们教师的这种做法,则令人深思. 在教学中,学生是学习的主体.随着教改的深
In ancient times a private school teacher, the “Qi (Qi) have this reason,” read “beans have this principle.” One student raised the question: “beans? Zeyoushan prefix?” The mountain is not a bean that is planted with beans, the mountain of beans is a long thing in the mountains, it really is a bean! This gentleman, I am right, only engage in “a word of the Church,” both Lack of the spirit of seeking truth from facts, and the lack of teaching democracy.At present, some of our colleagues also have, to some extent, the legacy of that private scholar.A few days ago, listening to a language class.Class, a student pointed out Teacher pronunciation error, the teacher a little unhappy Later, another student stood up and challenged the teacher's question, the teacher immediately board up his face: “is to listen to you or listen to me ?!” If you say The ancient gentleman's method is superficially ridiculous, then our teacher's approach, it is thought-provoking .In teaching, students are the main body of learning .As the teaching reform of the deep