论文部分内容阅读
自从1964年南京毛国瑶先生将他辑录的《石头记》批语150条抄寄俞平伯并经发表出来以后,在人们所知的《红楼梦》抄本中便增多了一个本子。由于毛国瑶先生说这个《石头记》抄本原是收藏在南京靖应鵾家的,所以人们便称它为“靖藏本”。这150条“靖本批语错得厉害”(俞平伯语),没有规律可循,不经过校理,“竟不能卒读”。但有一些批语却颇有一些新内容,属别的抄本中所未见的;因此还是引起了红学家普遍的注意。近三十年来,人们对这些批语曾不断进行了校读和研究;在对《红楼梦》版本及作者思想研究中,许多学者也曾不断引用这些批语。在种种研究中,人们大多确认它是一个存在,在陈庆浩、朱一玄等编辑、出版的《〈石头记〉脂砚斋评语辑校》及《〈红楼梦〉脂评校录》等书中,都把“靖藏本”批语列为一种。但据毛国瑶称,这个“靖藏本”从他抄录完批语之后便丢失了,又据南京靖家后代讲曾多方寻找迄无线索。因此,毛国瑶先生又成为迄今唯一见到过这“靖藏本”的人。由于该藏本始终不为人所目见,江苏省一些红学研究者对该藏本之存在与否提出了许多怀疑。毛国瑶先生是该藏本目见者,并亲手从上面抄录了与他本互异的150条批语;对持怀疑者做了许多解释 工作,对有些意见还进行了批驳。1991年毛国瑶先生曾公布了他从1959—1964?
Since 1964, when Mr. Mao Guoyao of Nanjing compiled and published 150 copies of his “Shi Ji Ji” remark and published it, he added a book to the well-known “Dream of the Red Mansions” transcript. As Mr. Mao Guoyao said that this “stone” transcript was originally collected in Nanjing, Jing Ying 鵾 home, so people call it “Jing Zang Ben.” These 150 “Jing this batch of speech is wrong” (Yu Ping language), there is no rule to follow, without going through school, “can not actually read.” However, some of the remarks are rather new in nature and have not been seen in other transcripts; therefore, they have also attracted the attention of red-eye scientists. In the recent three decades, people have carried out school reading and research on these criticisms. Many scholars have constantly quoted these criticisms in the study of the versions of Hong Lou Meng and the author’s thoughts. In many researches, most of them confirm that it is a real existence. In the books such as edited by Shi Qinghao and Zhu Yixuan, “Shi Ji Ji> Zhi Yan Zhai Commentary School” and “A Dream of Red Mansions> Zhi Ping School Records” “Tibet” this batch of comments as a. However, according to Mao Guoyao, this “Jingzangben” was lost after he transcribed the allegations. He also said that Nanjing People’s descendants of Nanjing had long been searching for no leads. Therefore, Mr. Mao Guoyao has become the only person to ever seen this “Jingbang Ben”. Because this collection has never been seen, some red-learn researchers in Jiangsu Province put forward many doubts about the existence of this collection. Mr. Mao Guoyao was the visible person in the possession of the Tibetans, and personally copied the 150 comments that differ from his counterparts. He also explained many of the interpretations to skeptics and refuted some opinions. In 1991, Mr. Mao Guoyao has announced his from 1959-1964?