论文部分内容阅读
如果将司法裁判过程看成是法官在多个备选判决之中作出选择的过程的话,那么,一个合理的裁判也就意味着一个理性的选择行为。出于理性选择的要求,法官的裁判选择应当满足一组条件,其实质在于满足选择行为对稳定连续偏好关系的要求。在语境独立的情况下,备选选项之间不发生影响彼此偏好序列的关系,但是在语境依赖的情况下,附加的选项会改变原有选项的偏好序列,从而影响裁判选择的稳定性。语境依赖的情形并非不利于司法活动实现定纷止争的功能,只是会对司法的确定性和可预测性带来危害,有效控制语境依赖因而具有必要性。而对语境依赖的限控,也就意味着应当确保法官在裁判选择的过程中回归并保持稳定而连续的偏好关系。
If the process of judicial adjudication is regarded as the process by which judges make choices among multiple alternative decisions, a reasonable referee also means a rational choice. Due to the requirement of rational choice, the judge’s choice of judgment should meet a set of conditions, the essence of which is to satisfy the requirement that the behavior of choice should stabilize the continuous preference relationship. In the context of contextual independence, the alternative options do not affect the sequence of preference sequences, but in the case of contextual dependency, the additional option will change the preference sequence of the original option, thus affecting the stability of the choice of the judgment . Context-dependent situations are not detrimental to the function of judicial activities in order to make ends meet, but they will jeopardize the certainty and predictability of the judiciary. Therefore, it is necessary to effectively control contextual dependence. However, the restriction of contextual dependence also means that judges should be ensured to return to and maintain a stable and continuous preference relationship in the choice of judges.