一、问题的提出从早年经典的“阿森纳”案、“千禧龙”案到近些年的“非诚勿扰”案,有关商标性使用的司法案例不断涌现。而随着法院在判决中愈发频繁地以“商标性使用”作为商标侵权判定的条件之一,似乎“商标性使用”在商标侵权判定中的地位已经得到了确认。2016年的“扑克牌小丑”一案中,山东省临沂市费县市场监督管理局以“开元公司在扑克牌大小王牌面上使用了姚记公司已获注册的小丑商标图案作为装潢,起到了区 First, the issue put forward From the early classic ”Arsenal“ case, ”Millennium Dragon“ case to ”You Are the One“ case in recent years, the judicial cases on the use of trademarks continue to emerge. However, as courts increasingly make ”trademark use“ as one of the conditions for the determination of trademark infringement in their judgments, it seems that the status of ”trademark use“ in the determination of trademark infringement has been confirmed. In 2016, in the case of ”Playing Card Joker“, Linyi City Feixian Market Supervision Bureau of Shandong Province used ”Kaiyuan Company to use Yao Ke’s registered clown logo as decoration on the playing card size , Played a district