论文部分内容阅读
近年来,中国法制史学科在很多大学、法学院面临被边缘化甚至被吞并的命运,作为法律史的一支——革命根据地法制史,更是冷门之中的冷门,甚少人去关注,相关研究成果对现实法治影响也微乎其微。以当代中国司法中极为受瞩目的司法调解为例,学者们宁愿去找在西方也是非主流的ADR,或“能动司法”作为理论依据,却忽略了扎根于新中国革命法制传统中的充满着乡土气息的“马锡五审判方式”。就此而言,新作《历史与现实的选择——陕甘宁边区法制创新研究》[1]的主题具有重要的意义,也表现了作者独具匠心
In recent years, the discipline of Chinese legal history faces the destiny of being marginalized and even annexed in many universities and law schools. As one of the legal history - the legal history of the revolutionary base area, it is even more unpopular and few people pay attention to it. The related research results have little impact on the reality of the rule of law. Taking the highly-regarded judicial mediation in contemporary Chinese judiciary as an example, scholars prefer to look for ADRs that are both non-mainstream in the West and “Active Judiciaries ” as the theoretical basis, while ignoring the roots of the traditional revolutionary legal system in New China Full of flavor of the local “Ma Xi five trial methods ”. In this respect, the theme of the new book, “Selection of History and Reality - A Study of Legal System Innovation in the Border Region of Shaanxi, Gansu and Ningxia” [1], is of great significance. It also shows the author’s ingenuity