论文部分内容阅读
由于槟榔属于我国《产品质量法》第四十六条规定的缺陷产品,在其不满足警示义务排除条件的前提下,本文认为生产者应依法全面地履行警示义务,在其产品的外包装上印刷“过量嚼食槟榔有害口腔健康”的警示标识。此外,在槟榔产品缺陷侵权诉讼中还要引入盖然性因果关系,以扭转消费者在证明侵权行为与损害后果之间因果关系的被动地位,以更好得维护其自身合法权益。
As the areca belongs to the defective product stipulated in Article 46 of the “Product Quality Law” in our country, under the premise that it does not meet the exclusionary conditions of the warning obligation, this paper argues that the producer should fully fulfill the warning obligation in accordance with the law, Printed “excessive chewing betel nut harmful oral health” warning signs. In addition, causal causation should also be introduced into litigation of product defects in betel nut to reverse consumers’ passive position in proving the causal relationship between the infringement and the consequence of damage so as to better safeguard their own legitimate rights and interests.