论文部分内容阅读
在附条件法律行为中,条件的重要特征之一为或然性。我国理论界对条件的或然性存在客观说和主观说的对立。两种观点的分歧在于,既成事实是否可以作为条件。附条件法律行为的制度价值体现在将当事人的行为动机外在化,故应从当事人意思自治角度探讨既成事实条件的可能性和必要性。以意思自治为基础的既成事实条件,只有在当事人双方均不欲从事约定的法律行为时,才丧失其条件的法律意义。
Among the conditional legal acts, one of the important characteristics of the conditions is contingency. The contradiction between the objective theory and the subjective theory exists in the theoretical possibility of our country. The difference between the two views is whether the fait accompli can be used as a condition. The institutional value of conditional legal acts is reflected in the external motivation of the parties involved, so the possibility and necessity of the conditions of the existing facts should be explored from the perspective of the autonomy of parties. The factual condition of fact based on the autonomy of purpose loses the legal significance of its conditions only when both parties do not want to engage in agreed legal acts.