论文部分内容阅读
简述了20世纪哲学经历了从科学主义到人文主义的转向,而西方建筑批评范式也由语言学批评转向话语学批评。提出语言学批评方法重视研究对象的共性,排除其特殊性,强调确定性研究;话语学批评采用的是一种“不确定性”的对话批评方法,提供的是一个有多种对话形成的话语语境,而不再是某些确定的观点和结论,批评的意义便是由多个批评话语组成的复合意义,是一种多元的、不确定的、复杂的意义;科学主义和人文主义分别构成了语言学批评和话语学批评的哲学基础。
It briefly states that 20th century philosophy has undergone a shift from scientism to humanism and that western paradigm of architectural criticism has also shifted from linguistic criticism to discursive criticism. Put forward that the linguistic criticism method pays attention to the commonness of the research object, excluding its particularity and emphasizing the deterministic research. The discourse criticism adopts an “uncertainty” dialogue and criticism method, which provides a dialogue with a variety of forms Rather than some definite viewpoints and conclusions. The significance of criticism is the complex meaning composed of multiple critical discourses, which is a pluralistic, indefinable and complicated meaning. Scientism and humanism Respectively, constitute the philosophical foundation of linguistic criticism and discourse criticism.