对于诸如全球气候变迁等环境问题的处理从未像现在这样具有强烈的道德迫切性,然而为环境风险管理找到商业理由,长期以来一直是提倡“信誉危机”或“股东参与”的温和派与提倡最大限度实现股东权益的强硬派之间的激烈斗争。奥克拉荷马大学管理学院的战略管理教授Mark P. Sharfman、Chitru S.Fernando以及经济学教授Michael F. Price,分别研究了标准普尔的500家企业向美国环境保护局 While handling environmental issues such as global climate change has never been more ethical as it is now, finding a business justification for environmental risk management has long been a catalyst for “credit crisis” or “shareholder involvement.” Moderate struggles between moderates and hardliners who advocate the maximization of shareholder rights. Mark P. Sharfman, Professor of Strategic Management at the University of Oklahoma University, Chitru S. Fernando, and Michael F. Price, a professor of economics, studied how S & P’s 500 companies report to the US Environmental Protection Agency