经历了从宏观向微观、从结构比较分析向机制过程分析转向的蒂利,在其后期作品《为什么?》一书中提出了四种理由给定的方式:惯例、故事、准则和专业表述。本文将对该书有关理由的界定、四种理由给定方式的划分及理由给定之社会过程等方面进行反思,并在此基础上进一步追问蒂利的基本立场。最后,通过分析社会学家舍夫和格拉德维尔对蒂利的进一步拓展与延伸,以说明在蒂利那里仅仅作为一种理由给定方式的故事,所可能具有的更广泛的情感意义和社会整合力量。 After going through the analysis from macro to micro and from structural comparative analysis to mechanistic process analysis, Tilly put forward four ways of giving reasons: “Practice, story, guideline and professional expression” in his later work “Why?”. This article will reflect on the definition of the book’s reasons, the division of the four reasons given way and the social process given by reason, and on this basis, further question Tilly’s basic position. Finally, by analyzing the further expansion and extension of Tilly’s work by sociologist Shev and Gladwell to illustrate the more emotionally meaningful and social implications of the story of a given manner in Tilly as a mere rationale Integrate power.