《清史稿》是研究清代人物的重要史料。但在传统正史系列中,《清史稿》质量欠佳,舛误较多,亦为学界共识,其《循吏传》亦未能幸免。然而《清史稿》毕竟是一部有着较大影响的史书,其中的讹误可能会产生不小的危害,故订正其舛误很有必要。本文现以中华书局1977年点校本《清史稿》为底本,以《清史稿·循吏传》为中心,对其中存在的大量错误做一比较系统、全面的清理,现就其中所记人名字号方面的错误进行考订,~①以就教方家,亦 “Qing Dynasty draft” is an important historical data of the Qing Dynasty. However, in the series of traditional orthodox history, the quality of the “History of the Qing Dynasty” is not good and there are many mistakes. It is also a consensus of the academic circles that its “official prosecution” has not been spared. However, “History of the Qing Dynasty” is, after all, a history book with a great influence. The corruption in it may have a great harm. Therefore, it is necessary to correct its mistakes. This article is based on the Zhonghua Book Company of 1977 point school “history of the Qing Dynasty draft” as the base, with the “history of the Qing Xie draft Xun Li” as the center, there is a large number of errors to do a more systematic and comprehensive clean up, Number of errors in the examination, ~ ① to teach Fangfang, also