论文部分内容阅读
目的:研究优质护理对神经衰弱患者的实施效果。方法:选取2015年11月-2016年11月之间收治的神经衰弱患者74例作为研究对象,随机分为观察组与对照组,每组患者37例,对照组患者接受常规护理,观察组患者在常规护理的基础上接受优质护理,对两组患者焦虑评分及护理满意度进行对比分析。结果:在接受护理之前,两组患者的焦虑评分之间不存在明显的差异,无统计学意义(P>0.05)。通过护理干预,两组患者的焦虑评分均低于护理前,差异明显有统计学意义(P<0.05)。观察组患者的焦虑评分显著低于对照组(P<0.05),患者护理满意度明显优于对照组(P<0.05),两组患者的差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论:对神经衰弱患者进行优质护理能够获得比常规护理干预更好的效果,值得在临床进行推广。
Objective: To study the effect of high-quality nursing on patients with neurasthenia. Methods: Seventy-four patients with neurasthenia who were admitted between November 2015 and November 2016 were selected as study subjects and randomly divided into observation group and control group, with 37 patients in each group. Patients in control group received routine nursing care. Patients in observation group On the basis of routine nursing, we received good nursing care and compared anxiety scores and nursing satisfaction between the two groups. Results: Before receiving nursing care, there was no significant difference between the two groups in anxiety scores, which was not statistically significant (P> 0.05). Through nursing intervention, anxiety scores of the two groups were lower than before nursing, the difference was statistically significant (P <0.05). The anxiety score of the observation group was significantly lower than that of the control group (P <0.05), and the patient satisfaction was significantly better than that of the control group (P <0.05). There was significant difference between the two groups (P <0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Good quality care for patients with neurasthenic patients can achieve better results than routine nursing interventions and is worthy of clinical promotion.