论文部分内容阅读
科斯范式到底预示了一种保守主义还是改良主义?权利的界定对于市场交易是重要的,但并不是必不可少的,而且界定权利本身也是有成本的,财产权的重要性并不构成私有财产权的一个论证。我们确实可以证明法律与效率问题无关,但其前提是交易成本为零。现实中的科斯范式并不仅仅表明效率方面,而且其涉及权利的分配。科斯范式的根本改变是一种相互性思维,并不是说一定要采取市场交易或者政府规制,也没有说到底是润滑交易还是重新配置更好些。具体情况下哪种方法总的效果好就用哪种方法,是一种改良主义。波斯纳以货币的实际支出来界定权利的重要性以及价值最大化作为法律的目标实质上是为既得利益者辩护,是一种保守主义。
Does the Kosmanian paradigm predict a conservatism or reformism? The definition of rights is important, but not essential, to market transactions, and the definition of rights is also costly, and the importance of property rights does not constitute private property rights One argument. We can indeed prove that the law has nothing to do with efficiency issues, but only if the transaction costs are zero. The reality of the Kosmos paradigm does not only show the aspect of efficiency, but it also involves the distribution of rights. The fundamental change in the Kosmos paradigm is a mutualistic thinking that does not mean that market transactions or government regulation must be taken, nor is it the case that lubrication trading or re-allocation is better. What kind of method under specific circumstances the overall effect is good which method to use, is a reformism. Posner’s definition of the importance of rights by the actual expenditure of money and the maximization of value as a legal goal are in essence a defense for vested interests and a kind of conservatism.