论文部分内容阅读
申诉人香港G公司(买方)与被诉人厦门S公司(卖方)于1989年2月28日签订了销售合同,购买被诉人提供的海藻酸钠17吨,合同的主要条款规定:货物品质粘度:250-280CPS;PH:5.5—7.5;装运期为1989年3月至4月10日;装运口岸为厦门,目的地为香港,允许转运和分批装运;合同的检验条款规定:“品质、数量、重量以中国商品检验或生产厂方所出之证明书为最后依据。”申诉人于1989年3月3日向被诉人开出信用证,并于1989年3月23日通过开证行支付给被诉人货款。1989年3月9日,货物在厦门装船,3月11日到达香港。 货到香港后,申诉人根据其与香港
The claimant, Hong Kong Company G (the purchaser), signed a sales contract with the respondent Xiamen S Company (the seller) on February 28, 1989, to purchase 17 tons of sodium alginate provided by the respondent. The main terms of the contract stipulate that the quality of the goods Viscosity: 250-280CPS; PH: 5.5-7.5; Shipment period of March 1989 to April 10, 1989; Port of loading in Xiamen, the destination for Hong Kong, allowing transshipment and partial shipment; the contract of inspection provisions: “Quality , The quantity and the weight are based on the certificate issued by the Chinese commodity inspection or manufacturer. ”The claimant opened a letter of credit on March 3, 1989, and passed the issuing certificate on March 23, 1989 Line payment to the respondent payment. On March 9, 1989, the cargo was loaded in Xiamen and arrived in Hong Kong on March 11. After the goods arrived in Hong Kong, the claimant had made a contract with Hong Kong