论文部分内容阅读
被王戎笙等人在媒体上炒得沸沸扬扬的“《新潮》著作权”案,其根本冲突乃是“郭沫若致陈明远书信真伪问题”,已延续5个年头了。但迄今学术界一直没有认同王戎笙等人的所谓“铁案”。例如李辉先生明确表示:“关于郭沫若写给陈明远的信的真伪,……不断有争论,但尚无定论。所以我在这里,暂且将之视为真实的史料来引用、来参考。”可见,王戎笙所谓“陈明远伪造郭沫若书信几十封,是中国近代史上伪造名人书信最显眼的例子。”(引自《北京观察》2000年第10期第54页)不过是他自己一相情愿的武断和幻觉而已。
The fundamental conflict between the “trendy” “copyright” case, which was controversially aroused by Wang Rongsheng and others in the media, was “the issue of the authenticity of the letters written by Guo Moruo to Chen Mingyuan,” which lasted for five years. However, academia has so far not recognized the so-called “iron case” of Wang Rongsheng and others. For example, Mr. Li Hui made it clear that “there is no conclusion about the authenticity of Guo Moruo’s letter to Chen Mingyuan, so I am here, for the time being, to refer to it as a true historical reference for reference.” It can be seen that Wang Rongsheng’s so-called “Chen Mingyuan’s dozens of pieces of letters forged by Guo Moruo are the most conspicuous examples of forged celebrity letters in modern Chinese history.” (Quoted from “Beijing Observation”, No. 10, 2000, p. 54) is nothing but his arbitrary Illusion only.