哲学上有个“秃头论证”，即：问少一根头发能否造成秃头，回答说不能。再少一根呢？回答还是不能。这个问题一直重复下去，回答是已经秃头了。而这个结论一开始是被否定的。我国加入WTO数月，人们并没看到潮水般的洋人大包小包地扛着美元到国内来投资，也没看到成垛成山的洋商 Philosophically, there is a “balding argument,” that is, asking whether one hair can cause baldness, and the answer says no. How about one less? Still can not answer. This question has been repeated. The answer is already bald. This conclusion was initially denied. After China’s accession to the WTO for several months, people did not see the flood of foreigners carrying large amounts of dollars to invest in the country, and they did not see the foreign merchants of Chengyu Chengshan.