这个题目有些问题:这个“批评术语”本身是一个恰如其分的学科性标志,事实上这个标志也是本文的议题之一。“博物馆”与“收藏”的合二为一及其不确定的摆动的实际效果之一是掩盖了其启蒙初期(不是说当下的争论)革命性与政治性的博物馆学史,但有利于(仅为表面的?)一种在技术上是中性的“现代化”的景观,即更早的、更个人化或无序的机构——古董 This question has some problems: This “criticism term” is itself a proper discipline mark, and in fact this mark is also one of the topics of this article. One of the real effects of the combination of “museum” and “collection” and its uncertain swing is to cover up the history of the museum of history, both revolutionary and political, at the beginning of its enlightenment (not to say the current controversy) But beneficial (for the surface only) A technically neutral “modern” landscape, an earlier, more personal or disorganized institution - an antique