论文部分内容阅读
自人类有意识伊始,就已开始不断探索语言起源问题,从悠久的神授说到现代科学视域下的实证研究都在摸索探寻语言的起源和本质。然而,至今依然是假说林立,莫衷一是。之所以出现假说的内在矛盾,原因在于:首先,这些假说都力图从肯定的视域来界定语言是什么,探析语言缘何而起,发掘语言之功用,它们越从肯定视域解释语言起源或本质,自身假说的限度和力度就越有限;其次,是研究理路的内在差异性;最后,就是对于语言、起源概念的认知差异。因此,本文试图从否定式的视域重新厘定关于语言起源的重要假说,剖析其研究理路,以语言作为生命实践为理据,探究语言起源背后的深层哲学问题。
Since the beginning of human consciousness, we have begun to continuously explore the issue of the origin of language. From the long teaching of divination to the empirical study under the modern science, we are all groping for the origin and essence of language. However, there is still a lot of hypotheses so far. The reason for the inherent contradictions of the hypothesis lies in the fact that these hypotheses attempt to define what language is from the affirmative perspective and explore the reasons why language begins to explore the function of language and explain the origin or essence of language from a positive perspective , The more limited and forceful the hypothesis of the self-hypothesis is. The second one is to study the inherent difference of the theory. Finally, the cognitive difference of the concept of language and origin. Therefore, this article tries to redefine the important hypothesis about the origin of language from the negative perspective, analyze its research approach, and take language as the basis of life practice to explore the deep philosophical problems behind the origin of language.