自上世纪70年代以来,生态伦理学中人类中心主义与非人类中心主义两大派别之间的争论一直受到学者们的广泛关注。生态伦理学在争论中不断的发展和丰富自身的理论。综观这一旷日持久之争,随着时间的推移及自然科学的发展二者争论的焦点也在发生着改变。本文从本体论、认识论、价值论及道德关怀层面,对二者争论的焦点作一次系统的梳理,认为人对自然负有的义务是直接的义务抑或是间接的义务是二者争论的焦点之所在。 Since the 1970s, the controversy between anthropocentrism and non-anthropocentrism in ecological ethics has drawn wide attention from scholars. Ecological ethics in the debate continue to develop and enrich their own theory. Looking at this protracted dispute, the focus of debate over both time and the development of the natural sciences is also changing. From the aspects of ontology, epistemology, value theory and moral concern, this article systematically sorts out the focal points of the two controversies, and considers whether the obligation that man has to nature is a direct obligation or an indirect obligation, which is the focus of both disputes. Where you are.