论文部分内容阅读
清华简《保训》篇为周文王遗训,不仅文风体式与《逸周书》记文王诸篇极为相似,而且词语也有与之相同或类似者,说明二者文献性质相同、时代相当。《逸周书》诸篇既为删《书》之余,则《保训》亦当为古《书》中之一篇。清华简尚有更多前所未见的《尚书》佚篇,则合《保训》在內的清华简《尚书》,自当为未经删削之古《书》之一部分。《保训》部分文字有可能出于实录,但全文或经后人改写润饰。改写润饰的时代,应在春秋早中期。篇內言“中”之事可与“伪古文”《大禹谟》、《君陈》、《君牙》诸篇相印证,证明其关于文王有宝训的记载当属可信,同时也说明“伪古文”诸篇不可能为魏晋人所伪造。
The articles of Tsinghua Bamboo Slips are not only written by Zhou Wenwang, but also written in the same style or similar with the same words or similar words in YiZhushu, which shows that both literatures are of the same nature and the times are similar. “Yizhoushu” all articles not only delete the “book”, then “Paul training” should also be one of the ancient “book”. Tsinghua University, Jane has more hitherto unknown “Shangshu” a lost chapter, then “Pauling”, including Tsinghua University, “Shangshu”, since when it is undrawn as part of the ancient “book.” “Paul training” part of the text may be out of real, but the full text or rewritten by the posterity retouch. Rewrite the era of retouch, should be early spring mid autumn. Articles within the words “in ” can be with “pseudo-classical Chinese ” “Yu”, “Jun Chen”, “monarch” Letter, but also shows that “pseudo-classical” all articles can not be forged by the Wei and Jin people.